cl

We have heard a lot of news over the past 12 months about soaring fuel prices and the effect it is having on the major automakers. With record-high oil prices, and gasoline running about $4.10 a gallon, drivers are spending more and more money to fill up their tanks. One of the natural options for people has been to move towards less expensive, small, and simple cars.

General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) noticed that fuel-efficient vehicles will be more appealing to consumers, and announced last week plans to reduce production at its truck division (a bit late to join the party, but at least it's something for the struggling auto maker). Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE: TM) is also slashing truck production during three months at its U.S. plants.

While It is true that most less expensive cars don't offer the same luxury when compared to sedans or SUVs, they come with a lot of options that can satisfy every individual need. Among the cheapest cars available, the article points out Honda's Fit ranked No. 11 at $13,950, a small car whose standard version comes with an adjustable steering column and four-speaker audio system, and is equipped with multiple airbags in the front, rear and side. Other vehicles that follow the same logic are the Chevrolet Aveo, ranked No. 2 at $11,460; the Toyota Yaris, third at $11,550, and the Kia Spectra, fifth at $12,895.

Even if growth in the U.S. and Europe slowed, China would be there to pick up the slack, or so the thinking goes. Now it looks, though, like that may not be working out. According to The Wall Street Journal, "Gross domestic product for the quarter was 10.1% higher than in the same period of 2007." Last year that number was almost 11%. Much of the drop is blamed on falling exports because economies have fallen off a log in the West.

To almost anyone else, a GDP growth rate of over 10% would be a dream, but to China it is probably more of a problem. Inflation rate in the country is rising at over 7%, and for commodities like food, the rate is closer to 20%. The increase in the number of Chinese middle class who can be consumers of much of the economy's local output and imports from other countries relies on rising wages. But a 50% drop in the Chinese stock market is already making many citizens in the nation feel pinched.

China cannot pay its workers more so that they can continue to become a consumer nation and cover the costs of rapidly inflating prices if income from exports is not there to drive GDP relentlessly higher. As odd as it may seem, a "recession" in China might happen even if the growth rate would be considered outstanding in any of the older industrial nations like the U.S.

GDP growth is only a relative indication of strength, and in China, the strength looks weak.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

U.S. stock futures edged higher Thursday morning, a day after market staged a big rally. Investors this morning are bracing for some housing data, but more importantly, a wave of earnings. Already better-than-expected earnings from J.P. Morgan Chase boosted stock index futures from earlier declines this morning.

On Wednesday, bulls finally came back in drove to but equity as oil price continued its decline and airlines and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) reported results that Wall Street found encouraging, sending airline and financials stocks through the roof. The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended a three-day losing streak, jumping 276.74 points, or 2.5%. The S&P 500 climbed 30.45 points, or 2.5%, and the Nasdaq Composite gained 69.14 points, or 3.1%.

Still, all this sentiment might yet evaporate, or be seriously damped after housing data is released at 8:30 a.m. EDT. Building permits and housing starts for June are due out at that time. Also, weekly jobless claims will continue to paint the picture of the goings on in the labor market. At 10:00 a.m., the Philadelphia Fed index for July will be reported.

It would be interesting to see how the data and earnings play out. Already, J.P. Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) reported it profit sank 53% in the second quarter to $2.00 billion, or 54 cents per share. That beat estimates of 44 cents share. JPM shares are up over 5.5% in premarket trading.

The plunge in oil prices and Intel's good earnings report from Tuesday were not enough to lift mood on Wall Street this morning. Investors, worried about a wave of data, earnings and Bernanke's second day of testimony, pushed U.S. stock futures lower. However, after yesterday's wild swings in the market, we may yet see futures change directions several times before the open.

On Tuesday, the session was marred by wild and volatile trading, induced by concerns over financials in general and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in particular. The steep drop in oil prices -- over $6 a barrel -- offset somewhat Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's bleak testimony. Sill, the Dow Jones Industrial Average ended 92 points, or 0.84%, lower to close under the 11,000 mark. The S&P 500 dropped 13 points, or 1.09%, while the Nasdaq Composite, in anticipation of Intel's earnings, rose 2 points, or 0.13%.

Today, more economic data and earnings will affect the Street's sentiment.
At 8:30 a.m. EDT, consumer price index -- inflation at the consumer level -- for June is due out. Again, there is a big difference between expected CPI and core CPI, which excludes food and energy prices.
At 9:00 a.m., May net foreign purchases will be reported and shortly after, June industrial production and capacity utilization.
At 2:00 p.m., investors could go over the released minutes from the last Federal Reserve meeting.

Meanwhile, Bernanke will continue his testimony that is due to start at 10 a.m. EDT.

U.S. business inventories rose a lower-than-expected 0.3% in May, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Tuesday.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected March 2008 inventories to rise 0.4%.

Further, inventories are now up 5.2% from May 2007, the Commerce Department said. The April business inventory statistic was revised higher to 0.5%.

Meanwhile, the inventory-to-sales ratio declined to 1.24. A year ago, the ratio was 1.26.

Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Tuesday the May inventory data can be interpreted two ways, with with positive or negative dimensions, depending on how one views the current corporate stance toward the U.S. economy, and the prospects for economic growth in the quarters ahead.

On the one hand, businesses are keeping inventories at a bare minimum -- a fact that typically is bearish, short-term, for the U.S. economy, Wang said.

The Home Depot (NYSE: HD) shares are trying to find their way today as investors digest Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke's testimony on the state of the economy before the Senate Banking Committee. Investors are worried that inflation and weakness in credit markets will continue to drag down the economy and were less than impressed by this morning's PPI numbers. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on HD.

After hitting a one-year high of $40.75 last July, the stock has hit a new one-year low today. This morning, HD opened at $21.39. So far today the stock has hit a low of $20.76 and a high of $21.69. As of 12:10, HD is trading at $21.47, down $0.06 (-0.3%). The chart for HD looks bearish and steady, while S&P gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a November bear-call credit spread above the $27.50 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make an 11.1% return in four months as long as HD is below $27.50 at November expiration. Home Depot would have to rise by more than 26% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

There were high hopes that Americans would run out and spend their tax rebate checks in a hurry, and that this would be just what the economy needed to get back on track. Well, it does seem that the checks were spent, but as weaker than expected June retail figures come in, it seems that it was a weak fix to a much bigger problem.

The program worked out pretty well in May, as retail sales grew 0.8% during the month, but we were sent back to reality today as June's figures showed that retails sales in the month grew at a measly 0.1%. This was lower than the 0.4% that Wall Street analysts were expecting. Since these figures typically get re-adjusted, it is not out of the question to assume that this figure could be even lower. May, for example, was originally reported to have had an increase of 1.0%, but that was lowered to 0.8%.

Once again, we have to assume that it is record high gasoline prices that are weighing on consumer's minds, as the biggest declines came in automobiles, furniture, electronics and building materials. Auto sales of course were the biggest drag on the retail numbers, and if you look at the figures while ignoring auto sales, then retail would have actually risen by 0.8%, but that is still under the 1.0% that analysts were predicting.

The Wall Street Journal [subscription required] reports that Ben Bernanke's congressional testimony is full of uncertainty. The interesting part is that he's suddenly coming to realize that there is inflation in the economy. With oil prices up five-fold from $24 in January 2001, the dollar down 72% and food prices triple where they were a few years ago, Bernanke's statement suggests that he his suddenly becoming aware that core inflation -- which excludes energy and food prices -- is not real inflation. His statement suggests he only now comes to realize that energy and food prices part of our economy too.

Investors are spooked by Bernanke's uncertainty. I would support an effort by Bernanke to stop the fall in the dollar, but in order to make that work, the White House will need to direct a change in policy. This would mean raising interest rates, reducing the budget deficit -- including ending tax breaks for the rich and pulling the plug on expensive wars, as well as paying down the $9.5 trillion federal debt.

Guess what? That policy will not happen under the current president. And if Paulson is serious about raising the national debt to bail out the mortgage industry, the dollar will grow even weaker. The administration's policy of waiting until a disaster strikes to wake up and do something is costing this country trillions. I think we're getting to the point where we need to ask whether there is a limit to how much bailing out the U.S. can afford.

Meanwhile, if Bernanke raises rates to combat inflation, it will be interesting to see what that does to the flow of credit.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter.

So far, billionaire investor George Soros says he doesn't see a light at the end of the tunnel; at least not yet.

Soros told Reuters Monday the crisis over Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) will not be the last, and that the wider credit crunch will continue to effect the already anemic-growth (or worse) U.S. economy.

On Monday, the U.S. Treasury announced a plan to shore-up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including authorization to buy unlimited stakes in and lend to the companies, aimed at stemming a collapse in confidence, Bloomberg News reported Monday. Soros said the U.S. Treasury's plan, and if need be, the resources of the U.S. Federal Reserve, will keep Fannie and Freddie functioning, but that does not blot-out the main negative: the drag effect of home foreclosures on the U.S. economy, Reuters reported.

'Most serious financial crisis of our lifetime'

Calling the year-long global financial market turmoil "the most serious financial crisis of our lifetime," Soros said the negative impact of foreclosures and the credit crisis is likely to increase, creating a deeper U.S. recession.

Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks that "while Soros provided a candid description of current events, no doubt derived from considerable research, he may have been a little too stark . . . seeing too much of one side of the asset / liability ledger."

U.S. producer prices soared a seasonally-adjusted 1.8% in June, the U.S Labor Department announced Tuesday, as rising energy prices continued to increase wholesale costs at an alarming rate.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected the June PPI index to rise 1.4%. Producer prices increased 1.4% in May and 0.2% in April.

The core rate, which excludes food and energy costs, increased 0.2%, the Labor Department said, below the Bloomberg News 0.3% consensus estimate.

Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks Tuesday the June PPI is another unfortunate data point for the economy, but it's not as bad as it appears. "The report is bad, but not as bad as it could have been. Energy really drove the index higher. If you took out gasoline prices, PPI would be down a half percentage point," Dawson said. "That said, energy prices are still rising at an alarming rate and they're a cost concern for businesses and individuals alike."

Who is next to fail/fall? That seems to be the only question on investors' minds these days, and this morning is not different as concern about the health of the financial sector grows. With global markets plunging overnight, the dollar falling to yet another record low against the euro and ahead of a day full of economic data releases and earnings, as well as a testimony from Fed chairman Bernanke, U.S. stock futures dropped this morning, indicating the market is poised for a lower open.

On Monday, what seemed like might be a promising day with the government plan to bail out Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) and several large deals including the mega beer deal between Anheuser-Busch (NYSE: BUD) and InBev. But once again financials took front stage and after IndyMac was seized by federal regulators over the weekend Wall Street tumbled. The Dow industrials fell 45 points, or 0.41%, the S&P 500 dropped 11 points, or 0.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite lost 26 points, or 1.17%.

As the day go on, investors will have more to chew on though as several economic reports are due out today. June Producer Price Index, a measure of inflation at the wholesale level, is due before the market open, at 8:30 a.m. EDT. While economists expect a smaller increase in prices in June, an increase is expected for both PPI and core-PPI, which excludes food and energy prices.
At the same time, June retail sales will be released, and may show a nice increase due to the government checks.
July NY Empire State Index will also be released at that time and it's likely we'll see it decline further.
Then, 10:00 a.m., a reading on business inventories for May is due.

What does the SEC's new policy entail? The Times says that the SEC will start today by focusing on "what policies brokerage firms have in place to prevent the passing of false information. The intent is to stop malicious rumors without hampering the natural exchange of information in the marketplace." I am not a lawyer but it sounds like the SEC will have a tough time monitoring all the exchanges of information among those on Wall Street unless it plans to record every cell phone, land-line, e-mail, IM, and Blackberry exchange all around the world.

Meanwhile, it seems that the government has strained to distinguish between fact and fiction when it makes big policy decisions. For instance, last year Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke were saying that the subprime problem was "contained." Would the SEC indict Paulson and Bernanke for spreading false rumors intended to manipulate stock prices? After all, their statements -- which are clearly false -- may have had the effect of causing investors to buy stock in non-subprime mortgage lenders. Could they get off the SEC's hook by proving they had no intent to manipulate stock prices?

Analysts believe that another 150 banks in the U.S. could fail over the near-term. According to The New York Times, "as many as 150 out of the 7,500 banks nationwide could fail over the next 12 to 18 months, analysts say. " The failure of IndyMac (NYSE: IMB) puts more focus on the problem

That puts investors in region banks in a tough spot. Shareholders in firms like NCC (NYSE: NCC) have watched the value of their stock drop from $33.54 to $4.42 over the last year as the bank cut its dividend and raised money. These holders can get out now because they fear an event which could take shares down to pennies. Or, they can hang on and hope that, once the financial crisis has passed, they may make some of their money back.

In many cases, the stock price is an excellent indication of what stockholders might want to do. IndyMac shares are down 99%. NCC's are down 85%, and its viewed by most as a bank that will "make it" because it has raised more money.

It would appear that the banks that the market is most worried about are off 90% to 96%. The institutions in that category probably carry the greatest risk of failure, if the stock market is an accurate indicator. The "if" part is the hard part.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

As the second quarter earnings crunch begins in earnest this week, the bear market has investors jittery and prognosticators spinning out dire warnings. In the wake of mixed results from Alcoa (NYSE: AA) and General Electric (NYSE: GE) kicking things off last week, here's a look at what Wall Street is expecting from many of the companies scheduled to report this coming week.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial are expecting the following companies to report a rise in earnings when compared to the same period of the previous year.

• Nucor Corp. (NYSE: NUE): $1.80 EPS (36.6%) on sales of $6.4 billion (+53.0%)
• Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG): $4.74 EPS (24.9%) on sales of $3.9 billion (+41.6%)
• Nokia Corp. (NYSE: NOK): 56 cents EPS (23.2%) on sales of $19.9 billion (+17.8%)
• CSX Corp. (NYSE: CSX): 90 cents EPS (21.1%) on sales of $2.9 billion (+12.8%)
• Altera Corp. (NASDAQ: ALTR): 27 cents EPS (18.5%) on sales of $346.7 million (+8.4%)
• IBM (NYSE: IBM): $1.82 EPS (+17.6%) on sales of $25.9 billion (+9.0%)
• eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY): 41 cents EPS (17.1%) on sales of $2.2 billion (+18.0%)
• W.W. Grainger Inc. (NYSE: GWW): $1.46 EPS (17.1%) on sales of $1.7 billion (+8.0%)
• Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT): 47 cents EPS (17.0%) on sales of $15.7 billion (+17.0%)
• Honeywell International Inc. (NYSE: HON): 94 cents EPS (17.0%) on sales of $9.2 billion (+7.9%)

Some of the country's largest retail chains had good June sales, benefitting from consumers looking for a place to spend their tax rebates, but this was not the case for higher-priced department stores. Retailers offering big discounts were among the privileges ones as consumers chose to stay away from high prices.

Consumers spent on the basics, looking for bargains, boosting sales at some companies like Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT), but resulting in losses for the others like Nordstrom (NYSE: JWN) and American Eagle (NYSE: AEO). This confirmed that retailers will face further weak demand even during the back-to-school shopping season, and more deep discounts will be needed.

As June is considered a key month for sales, merchants were hoping for a "stimulus" effect from tax rebates, despite worries tied to soaring gasoline and food costs. However, only companies offering cheaper gas like Wal-Mart, Costco (NASDAQ: COST) and BJ's Wholesale Club (NYSE: BJ) saw their dreams accomplished. Thus, Wal-Mart came with June sales growth of 4.3%, Costco reported a 9% increase in June same-store sales, while BJ's Wholesale saw a growth of 16.5%.